After
quickly contacting our suppliers and thoroughly communicating with the
distraught customer, we discovered the root cause of the problem. Water was
said to have been the only fluid coming into physical contact with the product
that the customer bought. However, the facility where the customer was having
issues is based in the United Kingdom. After researching the issue, Colonial
Seal realized that the United Kingdom’s water contains an organic compound
called, “chloramine.” Since we are a supplier based in the United States (and
our water does not usually contain chloramine) we never thought to ask our customers if
any extra compounds were mixed in with their water.
Individuals
involved in the process asked, “Why wasn’t this an issue two years ago when the
soda company first began using Colonial Seals?” When the customer first started
using our seals, our EPDM seals’ substance contained less than 1% of filler. When
we adjusted the consistency of our EPDM seal two years later, it contained
4.01% of filler. The new consistency just so happened to not be compatible with
chloramine. Although the company had a testing process they used on their seals
before putting them to use, the customer never thought to retest a seal that
they had used plenty of times in the past.
Such a
simple, small mistake turned out to be a huge problem. Anyone who has dealt
with seals on a large scale before knows how much of an impact a tiny, little
seal can have on a huge machine or system. In order to prevent cases such as
this in the future, we have put to use a published specification that
provides buyers and suppliers with a standard way to describe rubber, known as ASTM
D2000. Implementing the specification ensures that we are always on the same
page as our customers. We, Colonial Seal, know (from experience) exactly what
substances our seals are suited for and can ensure that precise details provided
by our customers will maximize seal capabilities.
No comments:
Post a Comment